Winter 1996

Recent Decisions by The Attorney General On Public Bidding

A&A Windows and New Bedford Housing Authority

The Attorney General ruled the Awarding Authority was wrong to accept a window sub-bid from one of the general bidders. To be eligible, a general bidder must customarily perform the sub-trade work with its own employees. Customarily means the general bidder must regularly or habitually do that work. It is not enough that the general had performed some limited window work on several prior projects. The Awarding Authority must apply an objective standard and require the general bidder to demonstrate it regularly performs the sub-trade. Here the general bidder did not meet that objective test and its sub-bid was invalid.

Carlin Contracting and Tri-Town Septage Treatment Facility

General bids required a listing of unit prices and a total lump sum contract price. The second low bidder Carlin added its unit prices wrong. If its unit prices had been added correctly, it would have been the low bidder. Carlin claimed it should get the contract arguing it was really the low bidder based on its unit prices. The Attorney General ruled otherwise, concluding the bid statute made the total lump sum price the official bid price even if erroneously computed

Amanti & Sons and The Town of Middleton

Where there are less than three filed sub-bids in a trade an Awarding Authority may not reject sub-bids and conduct a rebid unless the bids submitted were not reasonable for acceptance. Here the low unrestricted sub-bid was less than the Engineer's estimate. The Attorney General ruled that sub-bid was reasonable for acceptance and the Awarding. Authority could not reject it in hopes of getting lower rebids. The Attorney General directed the subcontract be awarded to Amanti

Plumbers and Gas Fitters Local 12 and Boston Housing Authority

The Attorney General ruled the low plumbing sub-bid was invalid because the bidder was not a licensed plumbing contractor and none of its officers were master plumbers as required by statute. The fact that the corporation obtained a license and hired a master plumber after submission of its bid did not save the bid from invalidity. A plumbing sub-bidder that is not licensed at the time of bid cannot be one that customarily performs the work of that sub-trade as the public bid law requires.


This newsletter is intended to provide general information of interest to the construction industry. It is not intended to provide specific legal advice or to address fact specific issues. For that you should consult your legal counsel. Corwin & Corwin LLP assumes no liability in connection with the use of this newsletter. The Supreme Judicial Court may consider this material advertising.
©1997-99 Corwin & Corwin LLP. All rights reserved.