|
A - D |
|
Acme Plastering Co., Inc. v. Boston
Housing Authority 21 Mass. App. Ct. 669 (1986)
|
Contractor's good faith effort to
fully perform contract warrented recovery in quantum meruit. Statutory penalty
interest not applied to quantum meruit recovery. |
|
Acme Plastering Co., Inc. v. Boston
Housing Authority 25 Mass. App. Ct. 985 (1988)
|
Denial of re-hearing of further
appellate review is a discretionary ruling and not a statement of the court's
position on the issue raised. Contractor entitled to pre-judgment interest
against public authority. |
Admiral
Drywall Inc. v. Cullen,
56 F.3d 4 (1st Cir. 06/08/1995)
|
Contractor's bankruptcy trustee
given priority in retained funds ahead of subcontractors who built the Project.
|
| A.J.
Wolfe Co. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. 355 Mass. 361 (1969)
|
Subcontractor entitled to payment
even though contractor not paid by Owner. |
|
American Air Filter Co. v.
Innamorati Bros. Inc. 358 Mass. 146 (1970)
|
Statutory payment bond construed
broadly to secure payment due subcontractors and suppliers on public projects.
|
|
Armor Elevator Co. v. Phoenix Urban
Corp. 655 F.2d 19 (1st Cir. 1981)
|
Unpaid subcontractor's claim
directly against HUD dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. |
|
Associated Subcontractors of Massachusetts, Inc.;
Montle Plumbing & Heating Co.; Norfolk Electric, Inc.; and Apex Corporation v.
University of Massachusetts Building Authority and University of Massachusetts,
442 Mass. 159, 810 N.E.2d 1214 (2004) |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority
enabling act exempted the Authority from application of c. 149, §§44A-H bidding
provisions where at least 50% of building funds were from non-governmental
source. |
| **A. Susi Construction Company v. M. Susi
& Sons 36 Mass. App. Ct. 1122 (1994)
|
Discontinuance of public
way. |
B.J. Harland Elec. Co., Inc. v.
Granger Bros., Inc. 24 Mass. App. Ct. 506 (1987)
|
Contract provision barring delay
damage on public job held to bar subcontractor's recovery of increased costs
caused by contractor's breach of statutory obligation to provide heat.
|
|
Blackett v. Olanoff 371 Mass. 714
(1977)
|
Deprivation of quiet enjoyment
ruled a constructive eviction. |
|
*Brisk Waterproofing Co. v. Director
of Division of Bldg. Const. 338 Mass. 784 (1958)
|
Awarding authority empowered to
reject single available sub-bid on deciding the price was not reasonable for
acceptance |
|
Chiappisi v. Granger Contracting
Co. 352 Mass. 174 (1967)
|
Subcontractor's failure to provide
contract notice barred extra work claim. |
Chicopee Concrete Service, Inc. v. Hart
Engineering Co.
20 Mass. App. Ct. 315
Aff'd - 398 Mass. 476 (1986)
|
Subcontractor awarded lost profits
where provision contractor relied on to terminate was not incorporated into
subcontract. |
|
City of Worcester v. Park Const.
Co. 361 Mass. 879 (1972)
|
Long delay in arbitration
selection did not waive arbitration. |
|
Commissioner of Labor and
Industries v. Lawrence Housing Authority 358 Mass. 202 (1970)
|
Public contract award under
federal turn-key housing plan held not to violate state bid laws. |
|
Consolidated Petroleum Corp. v.
Golosov 14 Mass. App. Ct. 1031 (1982)
|
Broker commission conditioned on
loan approval not due when loan disapproved. |
|
Crane Co. v. Park Const. Co.
356 Mass. 13. (1969)
|
Certificate of payment signed by
unpaid supplier barred later action on contractor's payment bond. |
C&H Masonry, Inc.
v. George Gould Trustee Of Nagog Knoll Realty Trust, Rose Gould, Trustee
Of Nagog Knoll Realty Trust and Donelan's Supermarkets, Inc.
|
Subcontractor could only lien the leasehold interest
where lessee entered into contract with general contractor and subcontractor's lien had no value since general
contractor abandoned project and there was nothing due or to become due at the time the notice
of contract was filed.
|
Danca
Corp. v. Raytheon Co. 28 Mass. App. Ct. 942 (1990)
|
Default of surety concedes only
surety defenses. |
|
Davis Associates Inc. v. Secretary
498 F.2d 385 (1st Cir. 1974)
|
Low bidder rejected on
recommendation of HEW denied right of judicial renew under the Administrative
Procedure Act. |
|
Department of Labor and Industries
v. Boston Water and Sewer Com. 18 Mass. App. Ct. 621 (1984)
|
Penny bidding on unit price
portion of bid does not require rejection of bid. |
| **Dependable Masonry Construction Co. v.
Saturn Construction Co. 37 Mass. App. Ct. 1102 (1994)
|
Extra work claims awarded
subcontractor on c.149, §29 bond plus legal fees. |
Dominic Gentile Painting
Co., Inc. v. The Aulson Co., Inc., 2000 Mass. App. Div. 19, (2000)
|
Subcontract not entitled to additional compensation since claimed extra work was
required by subcontract.
|
Drywall
Systems, Inc. v. ZVI Construction Co., Inc., 51 Mass. App. Ct. 353
(2001)
|
Arbitrators have the power to
award a subcontractor treble damages under c. 93A, §11 for unfair and
deceptive acts of the general contractor, but not legal fees. |
Drywall
Systems, Inc. v. ZVI Construction Co., Inc., 435 Mass. 664 (2002)
|
On further appellate review,
the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that arbitrators, acting under a broad arbitration
agreement, had the power to award a subcontractor both multiple damages and legal
fees under c. 93A,§11
against a general contractor who acted unfairly. |
|
E - I |
|
E.A. Berman Co., v. City of
Marlborough 11 Mass. App. Ct. 1009 (1981)
|
Subcontractor entitled to
substitution of equal material. |
|
*East Coast Steel Erectors, Inc. v.
Ciolfi
417 Mass. 602 (1994)
|
Mechanic's lien ruled enforceable.
|
Edward F. Zaniboni d/b/a Zander Corporation
v. J.S. Luiz, Third, Inc. and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company,
60 Mass. App. Ct. 1110 (2003)
|
General contractor's withholding of sums admittedly due subcontractors in an effort
to obtain an unfair advantage is a violation of c. 93A. |
**Electric Trade Management, Inc. v. Wayne J. Griffin Electric, Inc.
49 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2000)
|
Formation of a joint venture requires agreement on multiple factors.
Conclusory statements of agreement are insufficient for summary judgment. |
Empire Masonry Corp. v. Town of
Franklin
28 Mass. App. Ct. 707 (1990)
|
Substitution of sub-bidder on
public construction required when low sub-bidder refuses to sign contract.
|
|
Fall River Housing Authority v.
H.V. Collins Co. 414 Mass. 10 (1992)
|
No implied right of indemnity by
contractor against subcontractor. |
|
First National Insurance Co. v. Lynn
525 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1975)
|
Caption at top of payment
requiring faithful performance by project owner did not condition right of
subcontractors to recover against bond surety. |
|
Floors, Inc. v. B.G. Danis of New
England, Inc. 7 Mass. App. Ct. 356
aff'd - 380 Mass. 91 (1980)
|
Subcontractor denied statutory
legal fees incurred in arbitration. |
|
Fred C. McClean Heating Supplies,
Inc. v. M.J. Walsh & Sons, Inc. 349 Mass. 489 (1965)
|
Contracting officer's determination
that proposed substitute material was not equal, dispositive where not arbitrary
or capricious. |
|
Fred C. McClean Heating Supplies,
Inc. v. School Bldg. Com. of Springfield 341 Mass. 322 (1960)
|
Public authority may disregard
obvious clerical error in filed sub-bid. |
|
Fred C. McClean Heating Supplies,
Inc. v. Westfield Trade High School Bldg. Committee of City of Westfield
345 Mass. 267 (1962)
|
Filed subcontractor, carried by
successful contractor, whose bid was wrongly rejected, ruled entitled to
subcontract award. |
| **Frontiero Brothers, Inc. v. Thomas G.
Gallagher, Inc. 25 Mass. App. Ct. 1101 (1987)
|
Dismissal affirmed based on claim
splitting and prior pending action. |
|
Gaffny Plumbing & Heating Corp.
v. C.A. Batson Co. 1 Mass. App. Ct. 802 (1973)
|
Subcontractor specifications ruled
unambiguous. |
|
George A. Fuller Co., Inc. v.
Nelson J. Sanford & Sons, Inc. 5 Mass. App. Ct. 802 (1977)
|
Denial of application to stay
arbitration, not immediately appealable. |
|
*Grande & Son, Inc. v. School
Building Committee of North Reading 334 Mass. 252 (1956)
|
General bidder on public building
project cannot use an invalid sub-bid. General contracter ward ruled illegal.
|
|
Hampden Cornice Works, Inc. v. Leo
Spear Const. Co. 348 Mass. 798 (1965)
|
Architect's interpretation of
specification requirements upheld by state housing board, ruled conclusive.
|
|
Hardware Specialties, Inc. v.
Mishara Const. Co., Inc. 2 Mass. App. Ct. 277 (1974)
|
Subcontractor awarded extra where
contract ambiguity resolved by custom in the trade. |
|
H. Piken & Co. v. Planet Const.
Corp. 3 Mass. App. Ct. 246 (1975)
|
Absent a specific completion date,
contractor must complete within reasonable time. |
|
Industrial Engineering & Metal
Fabricators, Inc. v. Fontaine Bros. 2 Mass. App. Ct. 695 (1974)
|
Subcontractor awarded extra for
work not shown on plans. Statutory penalty interest not applied to extra work
resulting from good faith dispute. |
|
Industrial Engineering & Metal
Fabricators, Inc. v. Poorvu Const. Co. 354 Mass. 287 (1968)
|
General bidder qualified to file
sub-bid for miscellaneous metals trade. |
|
Interstate Engineering Corp. v. City
of Fitchburg 367 Mass. 751 (1975)
|
Filed sub-bid modified by
negotiation ruled illegal because it violates central legislative purpose of
fair competition. |
|
J - M
|
|
*James J. Welch & Co., Inc. v.
Deputy Com'r of Div. Of Capital Planning and Operations 387 Mass. 662 (1982)
|
Contractor on public project
denied extra administrative costs because of substitution of subcontractors.
|
J.C. Higgins Company,
Inc. V. Bond Bros., Inc., 58 Mass. App. Ct. 537 (2003)
|
Subcontractor entitled to interest
pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, §6C (12%) on disputed amount recovered from general
contractor. |
J.F. White Contracting Co. v.
Department of Public Works 24 Mass. App. Ct. 932 (1987)
|
Subcontractor entitled to extra
cost resulting from change in completion date after bid submitted. |
|
J.J. Finn Elec. Service, Inc. v.
P&H General Contractors, Inc. 13 Mass. App. Ct. 973 (1982)
|
Engineer's decision favoring
subcontractor not error of law and is enforceable. |
|
John D. Ahern Co., Inc. v. Trustees
of Boston University 12 Mass. App. Ct. 47 (1981)
|
Private owner not liable to
subcontractors for waiving payment bond. |
John F.
Miller Co., Inc. v. George Fichera Const. Corp .7 Mass. App. Ct. 494 (1979)
|
Public subcontractor awarded extra
for work not listed in its section of specifications. |
|
John H. Barrett, Inc. v. Joseph
Rugo, Inc. 3 Mass. App. Ct. 726 (1975)
|
Subcontractor awarded extra work
ordered by contractor. |
| John W.
Egan Co., Inc. v. Major Construction Management et al. 46 Mass. App. Ct. 643
(1999)
|
Payment bond surety
must pay a subcontractor bond claimant all interest owed by the general
contractor on unpaid amounts even where the surety had no notice of the claim
when it became due. |
|
Joseph A. Fortin Const., Inc. v.
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency 17 Mass. App. Ct. 911 aff'd. - 392 Mass.
440 (1984)
|
Harm resulting from owner failing
to require statutory bond occurs when inability of principal to pay becomes
apparent. |
J.P. Const. Co., Inc. v. Stateside
Builders, Inc. 45 Mass. App. Ct. 920 (1998)
|
Statutory legal fees on public
construction not limited by principal recovery. |
| **Julian Crane v. President & Fellows of
Harvard 11 Mass. App. Ct. 1044 (1981)
|
Crane supplier denied mechanic's
lien for lack of written contract. |
|
Kaufman v. Leard 356 Mass. 163
(1969)
|
The Architect was the owner's
agent in ordering contractors to proceed with work, and the owner was required
to pay the value of that work. |
|
Lawrence Plate & Window Glass
Co. v. Varrasso Bros. Inc. 353 Mass. 631 (1968)
|
Notice of specially fabricated
material not required for recovery against bond where materials are
incorporated in project. |
|
Limbach Co. v. George B. H. Macomber
Co. 357 Mass. 475 (1970)
|
Subcontractor awarded extra for
piping not shown on drawings. |
Lincoln-Sudbury Regional School
Dist. v. Brandt- Jordan Corp. of New Bedford 356 Mass. 114
(1969)
|
Low filed sub-bidder who withdrew
bid without justification liable for difference in bid price. |
| **Local 589
Amalgamated Transit Union v. Mass. Bay Transportation Authority, et al.
|
Mootness affirmed as basis for
dismissal. |
|
Long Island Painting Corp. v.
Beacon Const. Co. 345 Mass. 567 (1963)
|
Public subcontractor under c. 30,
§39F has direct right against funds retained by owner. |
|
*Loranger v. Martha's Vineyard
Regional High School Dist. School Committee 338 Mass. 450 (1958)
|
General bid not affected by
invalidity of filed sub-bid under amended statute. |
|
Lusalon, Inc. v. Hartford Acc.
& Indem. Co. 23 Mass. App. Ct. 903 aff'd - 400 Mass. 767 (1987)
|
Broad form liability coverage
excludes damage to material adjacent to sub's work. |
|
Manganaro Brothers Inc. v. Gevyn
Construction Corp. 610 F.2d 23 (1stCir. 1979)
|
Subcontractor denied lost profits
against contractor for breach unrelated to termination by Project owner which
prevented subcontractor's completion. |
|
Manganaro Drywall, Inc. v.
Penn-Simon Const. Co. 357 Mass. 653 (1970)
|
Compromise agreement signed by
contractor providing for retroactive interest on default, enforced.
|
|
Manganaro Drywall, Inc. v. White
Const. Co., Inc. 372 Mass. 661 (1977)
|
Statutory legal fees to
subcontractor who recovers against payment bond on public project ruled
constitutional. |
| **Manganaro v. Mansour 9 Mass. App. Ct. 938
(1980)
|
Master's report favoring
subcontractor affirmed in the absence of timely objections. |
McCoy
v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 950 F.2d 13 (1st Cir.
1991)
|
Mechanic's lien statute providing
union trust funds a means to secure payment of delinquent accounts ruled
pre-empted by ERISA. |
| Metro
Insulation Corp. v. Leventhal 1 Mass. App. Ct. 213 (1973)
|
Agreement on extra
work overrides notice requirements. Custom in trade used to determine subs
contract obligation. |
|
M.L. Shalloo, Inc. v. Ricciardi
& Sons Const., Inc. 348 Mass. 682 (1965)
|
Subcontractor allowed recovery for
extra work where contractor held to waive contract notice requirements.
|
| **Mishara Construction Co. v. Philip Renzi
& Sons 636 F2d 1198 (1980)
|
Contractor justified in
terminating subcontract. |
|
*Modern Continental v. City of
Lowell 391 Mass. 829 (1984)
|
Preliminary injunction to stop
illegal bidding procedure, affirmed. Prequalification a non-waivable statutory
requirement |
**Montle Plumbing &
Heating Co. v. J.K. Scanlan Company 46 Mass. App. Ct. 1109
(1999)
|
Notice of backcharges against
filed subcontractor invalid because not in writing. |
| **Montle Plumbing &
Heating Co., Inc. v. Sullivan- Foster, Inc. et al. 37 Mass. App. Ct. 1102
(1994)
|
Summary judgment affirmed against
general contractor and surety. |
| **Morganti, Inc. v. Division of Capital
Planning and Operations
39 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 (1995)
|
Claim for extra compensation for
work not described in RFP or included in contractor's proposal. |
|
N - R
|
| N.B. Kenney Company, Inc. v. National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA; Town of Ipswich, third part defendant, 70
Mass. App. Ct. 736 (2007)
|
A c. 149, §29 payment bond claim is timely when
court action is filed one year after claimant completes its subcontract work.
The time for filing is not measured when claimant completes work involved in the
dispute. |
| **N.F. Laurence & Associates, Inc. v.
Boston Housing Authority 35 Mass. App. Ct. 1113 (1993)
|
Claim for extra work by architect
denied. |
Norfolk
Elec., Inc. v. Fall River Housing Authority 417 Mass. 207 (1994)
|
State bid law controls despite
federal funds. |
| **Patterson Kelly v. United 8 Mass. App. Ct.
951 (1979)
|
C.149, §29 notice by
incomplete sub-sub timely when made within 65 days of contract termination,
even though more than 65 days after last performance. |
|
Paul Sardella Const. Co., Inc. v.
Braintree Housing Authority 371 Mass. 235 (1976)
|
Bidder wrongly denied contract,
limited to recovering bid preparation costs. |
|
PDM Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v.
Suffolk Constr. Co., Inc. 35 Mass. App. Ct. 228 (1993)
|
Wrongly terminated subcontractor
limited to quantum meruit recovery. |
|
PDM Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Findlen 13 Mass. App. Ct. 950 (1982)
|
Subcontractor recovers Eichleay
overhead for delayed completion. |
|
Peabody Const. Co., Inc. v. City of
Boston 28 Mass. App. Ct. 100 (1989)
|
Public Authority has broad
discretion to reject bid for minor non-compliance. |
|
Plymouth-Carver Regional School
Dist. v. J. Farmer & Co., Inc. 407 Mass. 1006 (1990)
|
Arbitrator decision final.
|
| **Poole Construction Company, Inc. v. Town of
Rockport 38 Mass. App. Ct. 1127 (1995)
|
Gravel permit ruled a contract.
|
| *Poorvu
Const. Co. v. Nelson Elec. Co. 335 Mass. 545 (1957)
|
In the absence of
statutory authority, a contractor may not require a filed sub-bidder to provide
a bond. Filed sub-bids are offers which contractors may only accept
unconditionally. |
Powell's General Contracting Co., Inc. v. Marshfield Housing Authority 7 Mass.
App. Ct. 763 (1979)
|
Public owner waived contract
dispute resolution by proceeding to trial. |
|
Powers Regulator Co. v. U.S.
Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 7 Mass. App. Ct. 913 (1979)
|
Payment bond surety bound by
arbitration decision. |
|
Quincy Ornamental Iron Works, Inc.
v. Findlen 353 Mass. 85 (1967)
|
General bidder, who did not
customarily perform the miscellaneous metal sub-trade, ruled an ineligible
sub-bidder. |
| **Raymond A. Carye v. P.J. Stella
Construction Corp. 31 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 (1991)
|
Arbitrator awarded interest
confirmed. |
| **R.E. Chapman Co. v. Diso Corp. 816 F2d 670
(1987)
|
Subcontractor entitled to payment
based on unit prices, not limited by quantity estimate. |
| Richard J. Madigan, Trustee of Oxford Road Realty
Trust v. Trace Construction, Inc.; CB Seating, Inc.; L.C. Anderson, Inc.; Millis
Plumbing Co., Inc.; O’Connor Door Corporation; Quinn Brothers of Essex, Inc., 71
Mass. App. Ct. 1 (2007)
|
Summary discharge under c. 254, §15 denied where
disputed material facts existed in dispute between subcontractor, general
contractor and owner on leasehold interest liens. |
Richardson Elec. Co., Inc. v. Peter Francese & Son, Inc. 21 Mass. App. Ct.
47 (1985)
|
Contractor responsible to
subcontractor for inadequate specifications prepared by owner. |
|
Roblin Hope Industries, Inc. v. J.A. Sullivan Corp. 6 Mass. App. Ct. 481 (1978)
|
General contractor liable to low
sub-bidder for arbitrarily refusing substitution. |
Roblin
Hope Industries, Inc. v. J.A. Sullivan Corp (No. 2) 11 Mass. App. Ct. 76 (1980)
|
Sub-bidder recovers lost profits
from general contractor based on bid price less estimated direct cost to
complete. |
|
Rudolph v. City Manager of Cambridge
341 Mass. 31 (1960)
|
Awarding Authority's substitution
of higher sub-bid for low sub-bid carried by general contractor, ruled illegal.
|
**Ryan Iron Works, Inc. v. J.F. White
Construction Company, Inc. 44 Mass. App. Ct. 1126 (1998)
|
Specifications ruled ambiguous and
subcontractor's claim denied where it made no prebid inquiry. |
|
S - Z
|
|
Salter v. Scott 363 Mass. 396
(1973)
|
Retrial of district court action
in Superior Court required under remand statute. |
|
Savignano v. Gloucester Housing
Authority 344 Mass. 668 (1962)
|
Contractor denied extra work where
it proceeded without written notice and the clerk of works had no apparent
authority to waive the requirement. |
|
*Simon v. State Examiners of
Electricians
18 Mass. App. Ct. 17 rev. - 395 Mass. 238 (1985)
|
Fire alarm installation not
subject to electrical licensing. |
|
Snyder v. Murphy 10 Mass. App. Ct.
534 (1980)
|
Union trust fund recovers
contributions under collective bargaining agreement from non-signatory.
|
| **State Wide Concrete v. Titan Northeast 26
Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1988)
|
Termination of subcontract ruled
justified. |
|
*Sutton Corp. v. Metropolitan Dist.
Com'n
423 Mass. 200 (1996)
|
Statutory notice supercedes
contract notice for extra work caused by subsurface conditions. |
| **The Cheviot Corporation v. Building and
Construction Systems 32 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (1992)
|
Default judgment against principal
also binding on bond surety. |
**The Dow Company, Inc.
v. Gaffny Corporation Contractors 43 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (1997)
|
Extra work claims awarded
subcontractor plus legal fees under c.149, §29. |
United States Fidelity v. United
States 475 F.2d 1377 (1973)
|
Unpaid subcontractors have
priority right to retained funds held by the government, but sovereign immunity
barred subcontractor claims. |
|
United States f.u.b.o. Ahern v.
J.F. White Contracting Co. 649 F.2d 29 (1stCir. 1981)
|
Miller Act bond notice by
incomplete sub-sub ruled untimely when made within 90 days of contract
termination but more than 90 days after last performance. |
|
Vance v. City of Haverhill 352
Mass. 772 (1967)
|
Bond notice in the name of a
related entity sufficient to satisfy public bond statute. |
| **Venus Drywall, Inc.
v. Kullman Industries, Inc. et al. 44 Mass. App. Ct. 1122 (1998)
|
Lien release did not bar
subcontractor's recovery against c.149, §29 payment bond. |
**Wallboard Supply
Company, v. Charles Construction Co. 44 Mass. App. Ct. 1111
(1998)
|
C.149, §29 bond notice of
material supplier timely when made within 65 days of last delivery.
|
|
Water Works Supply Corp. v. Cahill
344 Mass. 442 (1962)
|
Subcontractor who filed timely
sworn statement permitted to intervene in existing bond suit more than one year
later. |
| **William Higgins, et al. v. Marsico, et al.
34 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (1993)
|
Claim by condominium
association. |
|
Worcester Air Conditioning Co.,
Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 14 Mass. App. Ct. 352 (1982)
|
Sub-subcontractor notice adequate
to recover on statutory bond. |
|
Yanofsky v. Marinucci Bros. &
Co. 351 Mass. 698 (1966)
|
Payment bond surety required to
pay interest due under the subcontract. |
|
|
Copyright © 1999-2006 Corwin & Corwin LLP. |